What is lactic acid?

Lactic acid is a byproduct of anaerobic respiration - the process by which cells generate energy (in the form of ATP) in the absence of oxygen.

Side-by-side diagram comparing aerobic and anaerobic respiration in muscle cells, each illustrated with a figure of an athlete and a pathway diagram. Aerobic respiration (left): A runner in a low, steady-pace position represents aerobic exercise. A magnified circle shows striated muscle tissue. An arrow indicates glucose and oxygen (O₂) crossing the cell membrane and entering a mitochondrion, which produces carbon dioxide (CO₂), water (H₂O), and ATP as end products. Anaerobic respiration (right): A sprinter in a high-intensity running pose represents anaerobic exercise. A magnified circle again shows muscle tissue. An arrow indicates glucose crossing the cell membrane, but this time no mitochondrion is involved — instead the pathway produces lactic acid and ATP directly in the cytoplasm. The diagram illustrates the key distinction between the two pathways: aerobic respiration requires oxygen and uses mitochondria to produce ATP efficiently, while anaerobic respiration occurs without oxygen, bypasses the mitochondria, and produces lactic acid as a byproduct.

Our skeletal muscles, in particular fast-twitch glycolytic (Type IIx) muscle fibres, are the main producers of lactic acid in the body.

Flow diagram titled "Lactic Acid Fermentation" illustrating the two-stage biochemical pathway from glucose to lactate. Glycolysis (top stage): Glucose is converted into 2 pyruvate molecules via glycolysis. During this stage, 2 ADP are phosphorylated to yield a net gain of 2 ATP, and 2 NAD⁺ are reduced to 2 NADH. NAD⁺ Regeneration (bottom stage): The 2 pyruvate molecules are converted into 2 lactate molecules. In this step, the 2 NADH produced during glycolysis are oxidised back to 2 NAD⁺, regenerating the NAD⁺ required to sustain continued glycolysis in the absence of oxygen. Curved teal arrows show the cycling of NAD⁺ and NADH between the two stages, emphasising that lactic acid fermentation allows glycolysis to continue under anaerobic conditions by recycling the electron carrier.

During intense, anaerobic exercise such as sprinting or powerlifting, our Type IIx fibres break down glucose for energy through a process called glycolysis. This generates a molecule pyruvate, which is then converted by an enzyme called lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) into lactic acid (lactate).

What is lactate?

As you may recall from high school chemistry lessons, strong acids quickly dissociate in watery solutions into hydrogen ions (H+) and anions. It is this generation of H+ ions, which lowers pH, that makes a molecule an acid.

In the same way, a molecule of lactic acid produced in the body quickly dissociates, yielding lactate (an anion) and a hydrogen ion (H+). For this reason, the terms ‘lactic acid’ and ‘lactate’ are often used interchangeably.

Chemical structure diagram showing the reversible dissociation of lactic acid into lactate and a hydrogen ion (H⁺). On the left, the structural formula of lactic acid is shown, featuring a carboxyl group (COOH), a hydroxyl group (OH), a hydrogen atom, and a methyl group (CH₃) attached to a central carbon. A double-headed equilibrium arrow indicates the reversible reaction. On the right, the lactate ion is shown with an identical carbon backbone, but the carboxyl group has lost its proton and carries a negative charge (O⁻), alongside a free hydrogen ion (H⁺). The diagram illustrates that lactic acid is a weak acid that readily donates a proton to form lactate under physiological conditions.

Source: Phypers, B., & Pierce, J. T. (2006). Lactate physiology in health and disease. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, 6(3), 128-132.

Rather than being merely a waste product of anaerobic respiration (glycolysis), lactate can act as a fuel source for muscles, in particular slow-twitch oxidative (Type I) fibres. More specifically, lactate can be converted back into pyruvate, which is then used in aerobic respiration (using oxygen)  to generate chemical energy in the form of ATP. Lactate is therefore a useful fuel source for skeletal and heart muscle during endurance activities that rely heavily on aerobic respiration (e.g. long-distance running).

In addition to muscle, the liver can also take up lactate and convert it into glucose. This process is known as gluconeogenesis. Glucose produced by the liver from lactate can then be reused by muscles for energy in a cycle called the Cori cycle.

Alt text: Diagram illustrating the multiple roles of lactate in the body, with lactate (represented by yellow spheres) at the centre and four outward pathways indicated by arrows. Neuron astrocyte lactate shuttle (top): An arrow points upward to an illustration of a neuron and astrocyte, indicating that lactate is shuttled between these brain cells as an energy substrate. Alternate energy source (right): An arrow points to a silhouette of a person exercising, indicating that lactate can be taken up and oxidised by working muscles and other tissues as a fuel source during exercise. Gluconeogenesis (left): An arrow points to an illustration of the liver, indicating that lactate can be transported to the liver and converted back into glucose via gluconeogenesis. Signalling molecule / Lactormone (bottom): An arrow points downward to a diagram showing lactate acting on clusters of cells (depicted in orange and blue), entering the bloodstream and exerting autocrine (acting on the cell that produced it), paracrine (acting on neighbouring cells), and endocrine (acting on distant tissues via the bloodstream) effects — collectively referred to as "lactormone" effects.

Source: Mishra, D., & Banerjee, D. (2019). Lactate dehydrogenases as metabolic links between tumor and stroma in the tumor microenvironment. Cancers, 11(6), 750.

As well as these roles in energy production, lactate may also act as a signalling molecule or hormone. For example, lactate in the bloodstream can signal to muscle cells to grow and start producing more proteins  - in other words lactate can stimulate muscle protein synthesis and hypertrophy (an increase in muscle size).


It does this by increasing the expression of various genes (e.g. mTOR, IGF-1) that promote growth. These signalling / hormonal properties of lactate have earned it the moniker “lactormone”.

Does lactic acid / lactate cause muscle fatigue and soreness?

Lactic acid and lactate have been historically maligned as the cause of muscle fatigue and burning sensations (i.e. “the burn”) during exercise, as well as muscle soreness following exercise.  We now know this isn’t strictly true.

During intense, anaerobic exercise, production of lactic acid by fast-twitch, glycolytic muscle fibres rises. As explained in the previous section, lactic acid quickly dissociates to yield lactate and hydrogen (H+) ions.

If allowed to accumulate, H+ ions start to lower the pH of the immediate environment of muscle cells. It is this acidic environment due to the build-up of H+ ions, rather than lactate per se, that is one cause of muscle fatigue and burning sensations during intense exercise. Nevertheless, concentrations of lactate in the bloodstream can be a useful proxy of H+ ions generated during exercise. In this respect, higher blood lactate concentrations may reflect increased generation or poorer clearance of H+ ions from the bloodstream, which can increase the risk of muscle fatigue (we will go into further detail on this in later sections).

Soreness following exercise (known as Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS)) is not due to the accumulation of lactic acid / lactate, but rather due to inflammation following microscopic tears to muscle fibres.

How is lactate cleared from the bloodstream?

Our muscle cells have specialised transporter proteins, known as monocarboyxlate transporters (MCTs), which move lactate and hydrogen (H+) ions together across their cell membranes.

By helping to remove hydrogen ions (along with lactate) from the bloodstream, MCTs ensure the immediate environment of muscle cells does not become too acidic, thereby helping to prevent muscle fatigue.

MCTs also allow lactate to be taken up from the bloodstream into muscles and be re-used for energy. Similarly, MCTs enable liver cells to take up lactate and convert it into glucose, which can then be released into the bloodstream and used by muscles for energy.

This process of moving lactate between different muscle cells, the liver, and the bloodstream is known as cell-cell lactate shuttling.

Let’s take a deeper look at lactate shuttling in the body.

Source: Feher, Joseph. (2012). Muscle Energetics, Fatigue, and Training. 10.1016/B978-0-12-382163-8.00030-X.

As described in the previous section, lactate and H+ ions are generated by anaerobic respiration in fast-twitch, glycolytic (Type IIx) muscle fibres. More specifically, through a process of glycolysis, glucose is broken down for energy into pyruvate, which is then converted into lactate and H+ ions.

If hydrogen ions (along with lactate) were allowed to accumulate in these fast-twitch muscle cells, they would soon lower the pH inside the cell, disrupting the function of various enzymes that allow the cell to survive.

To combat this, fast-twitch, glycolytic muscle fibres have a particular type of MCT transporter protein, MCT4, which pumps out lactate and hydrogen ions into the bloodstream.

Of course, if hydrogen ions and lactate were now allowed to accumulate in the bloodstream, they would again lower the pH of blood, perturbing the environment of muscle cells and other tissue, leading to muscle fatigue.

Our slow-twitch, oxidative (Type I) muscle fibres, however, have another type of MCT protein, called MCT1, which transports hydrogen ions and lactate from the bloodstream into muscle cells. The clearance of hydrogen ions (alongside lactate) by MCT1 therefore helps to regulate the pH of the immediate environment of muscle cells, preventing it from becoming too acidic and causing muscle fatigue.

Furthermore, MCT1 enables slow-twitch, oxidative Type I muscle fibres to re-use lactate for energy. Lactate can be taken up from the bloodstream by MCT1 and then converted into pyruvate. In turn, pyruvate can then be used in the process of aerobic respiration (specifically the citric acid cycle (TCA) stage of aerobic respiration) to generate ATP, which can be used to power muscle contractions. In this respect, MCT1 plays a key role in the recycling of lactate for energy during endurance exercise.

Diagram illustrating the cell-to-cell lactate shuttle between a glycolytic muscle fiber (bottom) and an oxidative muscle fiber (top), showing the contrasting metabolic roles of each fiber type and the transporters involved. Glycolytic fiber (bottom): Glucose enters via a GLUT transporter and undergoes glycolysis, producing pyruvate and ATP. The enzyme LDHA converts pyruvate to lactate, which is exported out of the cell along with H⁺ ions via the MCT4 transporter. Oxidative fiber (top): Lactate and H⁺ ions exported from the glycolytic fiber are taken up by the oxidative fiber via the MCT1 transporter. Inside, the enzyme LDHB converts lactate back to pyruvate, which enters the TCA cycle (tricarboxylic acid cycle) in the mitochondria, generating ATP. Glucose can also enter this fiber via a GLUT transporter, though the dashed arrow indicates reduced reliance on direct glucose uptake. Between the two fibers: The MCT1 and MCT4 transporters are shown at the shared membrane interface, with bidirectional arrows for lactate and H⁺ indicating the direction of net lactate flow from producer (glycolytic) to consumer (oxidative) fiber.

Source: Felmlee, M. A., Jones, R. S., Rodriguez-Cruz, V., Follman, K. E., & Morris, M. E. (2020). Monocarboxylate transporters (SLC16): function, regulation, and role in health and disease. Pharmacological reviews, 72(2), 466-485.

As alluded to earlier, MCT1 also allows liver cells (hepatocytes) to take up lactate from the bloodstream and convert it into glucose by a process of gluconeogenesis. Newly produced glucose can then be released back into the bloodstream and taken up by fast-twitch, glycolytic muscle fibres for energy as part of the Cori cycle.

How does the rate of lactate clearance affect muscle fatigue?

We’ve established that it is the accumulation of H+ ions alongside lactate in the bloodstream that contributes to muscle fatigue during intense exercise.  

In very simplistic terms, the rate at which hydrogen ions and lactate accumulate in the bloodstream is a function of two basic processes:

  • The rate at which lactate and hydrogen ions are generated and released into the bloodstream by muscle fibres during anaerobic respiration.
  • The rate at which lactate and hydrogen ions are cleared from the bloodstream by slow-twitch oxidative muscle fibres, liver, and other tissue.  

For a given intensity of exercise, people who clear lactate and hydrogen ions at a faster rate will accumulate hydrogen ions and lactate in their bloodstream less quickly. They will therefore be less likely to experience muscle fatigue and can tolerate a higher intensity of exercise before fatigue occurs.

On this note, you may have heard of the concept of lactate threshold. This is the intensity of exercise at which levels of lactate start to rise in the bloodstream, as the rate of lactate generation exceeds the rate of lactate clearance.

Endurance and high-intensity exercise training acts to elevate lactate threshold - in other words, it allows people to tolerate a greater intensity of exercise before blood lactate levels start to rise and fatigue sets in.

This effect is illustrated in the bottom two curves of the graph below, with the solid black post-training curve showing that trained individuals can sustain a higher running speed before blood lactate levels start to rise.

Dual-axis line graph showing blood lactate levels (mmol/L, left y-axis) and heart rate (beats/min, right y-axis) plotted against running speed (km/h, x-axis) for pre-training and post-training conditions. Blood lactate (circle markers): Pre-training (open circles) lactate remains relatively flat at approximately 1.2–1.3 mmol/L up to 10 km/h, then rises steeply, reaching ~4.5 mmol/L at 13 km/h. A downward arrow at 10 km/h marks the pre-training lactate threshold. Post-training (filled circles) lactate remains flat and low (~1.0 mmol/L) up to 11 km/h before rising to ~3.0 mmol/L at 13 km/h. An upward arrow at 11 km/h marks the post-training lactate threshold, indicating a rightward shift in the threshold following training. Heart rate (square markers): Pre-training (open squares) heart rate rises linearly from ~148 beats/min at 8 km/h to ~200 beats/min at 13 km/h. Post-training (filled squares) heart rate follows a similar trajectory but is consistently lower at each speed, rising from ~140 to ~197 beats/min, reflecting improved cardiovascular efficiency after training. Together the two sets of curves illustrate the dual adaptations of endurance training: a rightward shift in the lactate threshold and a reduction in exercise heart rate at equivalent running speeds.

Source: Jones, A. M., & Carter, H. (2000). The effect of endurance training on parameters of aerobic fitness. Sports medicine, 29(6), 373-386.

Studies suggest that this shift in lactate threshold following exercise training is largely due to increases in lactate clearance. Put simply, people who undergo exercise training get better at clearing lactate and hydrogen ions from their bloodstream, thereby preventing the accumulation of hydrogen ions during intense exercise. This allows trained individuals to withstand higher intensities of exercise before experiencing muscle fatigue and enables less recovery time between exercise bouts.

The enhancement in lactate clearance following exercise is likely due to the increased expression of MCT1 proteins by muscle cells, which enables greater clearance of lactate and hydrogen ions from the bloodstream. On this note, studies demonstrate that endurance, sprint, and resistance training can increase MCT1 content of skeletal muscle by between 18 and 90%.

What is the MCT1 gene?

As explained in the ‘How is lactate cleared from the bloodstream?’ section above, MCT1 (monocarboxylate transporter 1) is a type of transporter protein that moves lactate and hydrogen ions from the bloodstream to inside cells, including slow-twitch, oxidative (Type I) muscle fibre cells and liver cells.

The MCT1 protein is coded for by the MCT1 gene (also known as the SLC16A1 gene).  Variants of this gene may affect the expression of the MCT1 protein by skeletal muscle. This, in turn, can alter the rate of lactate clearance, susceptibility to muscle fatigue, and recovery times between exercise bouts.

What MCT1 gene variants do you look at?

Your Lactate clearance and building muscle (MCT1) trait looks at variants of the MCT1 gene created by the rs1049434 SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism).

This SNP causes a T > A change in the DNA code of the MCT1 gene, giving rise to a change in the amino acid sequence of the MCT1 protein at position 490 from glutamine (Glu) to aspartate (Asp).

The SNP therefore creates two different MCT1 gene variants or ‘alleles’:

  • Asp (A) allele
  • Glu (T) allele

(Note that the nomenclature of these different alleles may vary in the literature).  

The Asp (A) variant of the MCT1 gene has been linked to less effective lactate clearance. One study suggested that the Asp (A) variant caused a 60-65% reduction in lactate clearance, although the impact of this gene variant is likely to be lower than this.

How do MCT1 gene variants affect lactate clearance during resistance exercise?

As mentioned in the previous section, the Asp (A) variant (rs1049434) of the MCT1 gene is linked to reduced clearance of lactate from the bloodstream. We might therefore expect carriers of the Asp (A) variant, all other things being equal, to have higher blood lactate levels during resistance exercise.

To flesh out this theory: this is because, during resistance exercise (such as lifting weights), fast-twitch, glycolytic (Type IIx) fibres produce lactate and hydrogen ions during anaerobic respiration, which are released into the bloodstream. Asp (A) variant carriers may then less effectively remove these lactate and hydrogen ions from the bloodstream into slow-twitch muscle fibres, liver cells, and other tissue, therefore resulting in higher blood lactate (and hydrogen ion) concentrations.

Some small studies do seem to accord with this theory. For example, in a 2012 study by Cupeiro and colleagues, 14 women and 15 men all had blood lactate measurements taken during various resistance training circuits using free weights, weight machines, and a combined protocol involving alternating treadmill running and free weights. The circuits typically required subjects to perform 15 reps at 70% of 15RM with 2:1 s cadence for the concentric and eccentric phases respectively (45 s per exercise).

As can be shown in the graphs below, compared to men not carrying the Asp (A) variant (i.e. the TT or Glu/Glu genotype), men with two copies of the Asp (A) variant (i.e. the AA genotype) had significantly higher average and maximal blood lactate levels during the free weight and combined protocols. The Asp/Asp (AA) group also had higher maximal and average lactate levels during the weight machine protocol, although this only reached borderline statistical significance (p = 0.07) for average lactate levels.

Furthermore, men with one copy of the Asp (A) variant (i.e. the TA or Glu/Asp genotype) had significantly higher maximal and average lactate levels during the free weight and combined protocols compared to non-carriers (TT genotype), but their blood lactate levels were generally lower compared to those with two copies of the Asp(A) variant (Asp/Asp or AA genotype). This tentatively suggests an additive effect of the ‘Asp’ variant - carrying two copies of the Asp (A) variant may have more of a detrimental impact on lactate clearance compared to carrying just one copy.  

Four grouped bar charts comparing blood lactate levels (mM/L) across three exercise protocols and three ACTN3 genotypes (AA — white bars, TA — grey bars, TT — black bars), separated by sex and lactate measure. Error bars indicate standard deviation, and statistical significance symbols (**, *, †, ‡) denote significant differences between genotypes within a protocol. Average Lactate in Men (top left): Across all three protocols (Weight Machine, Free Weight, Combined), the AA genotype consistently produces the highest average lactate and TT the lowest. Significant genotype differences are observed in the Weight Machine Protocol (**) and Free Weight Protocol (*) and Combined Protocol (†), with values declining from ~12.3 (AA) to ~9.3 (TT) in the Weight Machine condition. Average Lactate in Women (top right): A similar trend is present but differences between genotypes are smaller and no significant differences are marked. Values across all protocols range from approximately 4–8 mM/L, lower overall than in men. Maximal Lactate in Men (bottom left): The same genotype pattern is observed for peak lactate, with AA producing the highest values (~14.7 mM/L in the Weight Machine Protocol) and TT the lowest (~5.6 mM/L in the Combined Protocol). Significant differences are marked in all three protocols (‡, *, †). Maximal Lactate in Women (bottom right): Maximal lactate values in women show a similar directional trend but no statistically significant genotype differences are indicated. Values range from approximately 4–9.5 mM/L across protocols. Overall, the charts suggest that the ACTN3 R577X genotype influences lactate production during resistance exercise, particularly in men, with the AA genotype associated with higher lactate responses across protocols.

Source: Cupeiro, R., González-Lamuño, D., Amigo, T., Peinado, A. B., Ruiz, J. R., Ortega, F. B., & Benito, P. J. (2012). Influence of the MCT1-T1470A polymorphism (rs1049434) on blood lactate accumulation during different circuit weight trainings in men and women. Journal of science and medicine in sport, 15(6), 541-547.

Interestingly, the study did not find any significant differences across MCT1 genotype in women. This may be because women in this study produced less lactate during exercise (as reflected by lower blood lactate concentrations), perhaps due to lower muscle mass or differences in blood volume.

The effect of differences in lactate clearance (caused by MCT1 gene variants) would therefore have less of an impact on blood lactate levels at the lower levels of lactate production observed in women. Put more clearly, the MCT1 protein coded by the Asp (A) variant would be able to clear away and cope with lower levels of lactate released into the bloodstream. As lactate production increases, however, the MCT1 protein would then struggle to clear lactate, leading to the accumulation of lactate in the bloodstream.

On this note, an earlier 2010 study by Cupeiro and colleagues found that men carrying the Asp (A) variant of the MCT1 gene had significantly higher blood lactate levels compared to non-carriers (i.e. TT, Glu/Glu genotype) during a resistance training circuit, but only at 80% of 15RM and not at lower intensity exercise (60 and 70% of 15RM).

This is shown in the graph below. Again, these findings seem consonant with a “lactate threshold effect”, whereby the impact of reduced lactate clearance by MCT1 on blood lactate levels is only manifest during higher intensity exercise, when the production and release of lactate and hydrogen ions into bloodstream by fast-twitch, glycolytic muscle fibres is greater.

Grouped bar chart comparing lactate accumulation slope values (LA Slope Value) between non-carriers (NC, white bars, N=3) and carriers (C, black bars, N=7) of a genetic variant, at three exercise intensities: 60%, 70%, and 80% of maximum effort. Error bars indicate standard deviation. At 60% and 70% intensity, LA slope values are nearly identical between non-carriers (~2.2 and ~2.35) and carriers (~2.1 and ~2.1), with no significant differences. At 80% intensity, carriers show a substantially higher LA slope value (~5.0) compared to non-carriers (~2.0), a difference marked as statistically significant (*). Non-carrier error bars are narrow at 80%, while carrier error bars are wide, reflecting greater variability in the carrier group. The chart suggests that genetic carrier status has no meaningful effect on lactate accumulation rate at lower exercise intensities, but is associated with significantly steeper lactate accumulation at high intensity (80%).

cSource: Cupeiro, R., Benito, P. J., Maffulli, N., Calderón, F. J., & González-Lamuño, D. MCTl genetic polymorphism influence in high intensity circuit training: A pilot study.

It’s important to note that the above mentioned studies have generally used very small sample sizes, making it harder to establish whether MCT1 has a true effect on lactate clearance and blood lactate levels. Furthermore, we know that exercise training has a strong effect on MCT1 expression and other physiological processes linked to lactate production and clearance; so the contribution of MCT1 gene variants alone to differences in blood lactate levels may be very small compared to training status, differences in muscle fibre composition, diet, and other lifestyle factors.

How do MCT1 gene variants affect exercise recovery?

Less effective clearance of lactate from the bloodstream may cause Asp (A) variant carriers to recover less well between exercise bouts.

Recall that the accumulation of hydrogen ions alongside lactate contributes to muscle fatigue during intense exercise. Being less able to clear away hydrogen ions (along with lactate) may therefore increase the susceptibility to muscle fatigue, as hydrogen ions more readily accumulate in the bloodstream.

One method of testing exercise recovery is to get someone to complete a series of short sprints, with each sprint punctuated by a fixed period of active recovery (e.g. jogging or walking). During the all-out sprints, lactate and hydrogen ion production by fast-twitch, glycolytic (Type IIx) muscle fibres will rapidly increase, causing a rise in blood lactate (and hydrogen ion) concentrations. During the active recovery sessions, blood lactate levels ought to then steadily decrease as lactate is cleared by MCT1 into slow-twitch muscle fibres, liver cells, and other tissues.

For someone with poorer lactate clearance, however, less hydrogen ions and lactate are removed from the bloodstream during the recovery periods. Hydrogen ions therefore start to accumulate, impairing muscle performance, with this effect being more pronounced after repeated sprints (as each recovery period is insufficient for lactate and hydrogen to be effectively removed). Consequently, we would expect the sprint times (particularly the final/later sprint times) of someone with poorer lactate clearance to deteriorate more drastically with repeated exertion.

On this note, a study of 26 elite male Italian footballers found that Asp (A) variant carriers had significantly slower mean repeated sprint times. Across a series of six sprints, those with two or one copies of the Asp (variant) ran a 30m sprint in an average of 4.61 and 4.55 seconds, respectively. This was significantly slower than the mean sprint time of 4.41 seconds in those with the Glu/Glu genotype.

Bar chart showing mean repeated sprint ability (RSA) time in seconds across three MCT-1 genotypes (AA, AT, and TT), with error bars representing mean ± 0.95 standard error and a line connecting the mean values to illustrate the trend. The AA genotype has the lowest mean RSA time (~4.41 sec), the AT genotype is intermediate (~4.55 sec), and the TT genotype has the highest mean RSA time (~4.62 sec). The y-axis is truncated (4.30–4.75 sec) to highlight differences between groups. The ascending line connecting the three means illustrates a stepwise increase in sprint time — indicating slower repeated sprint performance — from AA to AT to TT. As lower RSA times reflect faster sprint performance, the chart suggests that the MCT-1 AA genotype is associated with superior repeated sprint ability compared to the AT and TT genotypes, consistent with a potential role for MCT-1 in lactate clearance during high-intensity intermittent exercise.

Source: Massidda, M., Flore, L., Kikuchi, N., Scorcu, M., Piras, F., Cugia, P., ... & Calò, C. M. (2021). Influence of the MCT1-T1470A polymorphism (rs1049434) on repeated sprint ability and blood lactate accumulation in elite football players: A pilot study. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 121(12), 3399-3408.

(Please note that in the above study the Asp variant is referred to as the ‘T’ allele and the Glu variant is referred to as the ‘A’ variant. This may make things confusing!).

Moreover, the fifth and sixth sprint times were significantly slower in those with two copies of the Asp variant (Asp/Asp genotype) compared to other genotypes. For the sixth sprint, those with the Asp/Asp genotype had a mean sprint time of 4.87 seconds, which was significantly slower than those carrying the Glu variant (4.56 seconds).

These results suggest that slower lactate clearance in Asp variant carriers may contribute to poorer exercise recovery and worse performance under repeated exertion. It is important to note, however, that the study did not find any statistically significant difference in blood lactate concentrations between MCT1 genotypes, although there was a trend for those with the Asp allele to have higher blood lactate levels at 1 and 3 minutes after completing all six sprints. This is illustrated in the graphs below.

Alt text: Two bar charts comparing blood lactate concentrations between MCT-1 genotype groups (TT vs AA+AT, using an A-dominant model), with error bars representing mean ± 0.95 standard error and a line connecting the means to show the direction of difference. Left chart (Lc1-mean): Mean lactate at the first measurement point is notably higher in the TT genotype (~14.4 mmol/L) compared to the AA+AT group (~11.2 mmol/L), indicating greater lactate accumulation in TT carriers at this time point. Right chart (Lc3-mean): A similar pattern is observed at the third measurement point, with TT showing a higher mean lactate (~14.2 mmol/L) compared to AA+AT (~11.6 mmol/L). In both charts, the descending line from TT to AA+AT illustrates that individuals carrying at least one A allele (AA or AT) consistently show lower blood lactate levels than TT homozygotes, suggesting that the A allele of MCT-1 is associated with more efficient lactate clearance during exercise.

Source: Massidda, M., Flore, L., Kikuchi, N., Scorcu, M., Piras, F., Cugia, P., ... & Calò, C. M. (2021). Influence of the MCT1-T1470A polymorphism (rs1049434) on repeated sprint ability and blood lactate accumulation in elite football players: A pilot study. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 121(12), 3399-3408.

(Please note that in the above study the Asp variant is referred to as the ‘T’ allele and the Glu variant is referred to as the ‘A’ variant. This may make things confusing!).

It is possible that poorer lactate clearance in Asp (A) variant carriers also increases susceptibility to injury. The theory is that greater accumulation of hydrogen ions and lactate in the bloodstream at higher intensity exercise increases the risk of muscle fatigue, cramping and degeneration of muscle fibres, all of which can raise the risk of indirect (i.e. non-contact) muscle injury.

Researchers at the University of Cagliari examined this possibility by genotyping and following the injury rates of 173 footballers in the Serie A from 2009-2014. Footballers with the Asp/Asp (AA) genotype had an incidence of 1.57 (+/-3.07) muscle injuries per 1000 hours of game time, which was significantly higher than those with the Glu/Glu (TT) genotype (0.09 +/- 0.25 muscle injuries per 1000 hours).

How do MCT1 gene variants affect athletic status?

Some studies have found that elite (international) sprint and power athletes are more likely than non-athletes and national-level athletes to carry the Asp (A) variant.

In a 2013 study analysing the MCT1 genotypes of 112 endurance athletes, 100 sprint/power athletes, and 621 non-athlete controls, elite sprint/power athletes were found to be 1.92 times more likely than controls to carry the Asp variant compared to the Glu/Glu genotype.

This group of elite athletes, which included international 100-400m sprinters, powerlifters, weight lifters, throwers and jumpers, were also 3.40 and 2.20 times more likely than non-athletes and elite endurance athletes, respectively, to have the Asp/Asp genotype compared to the Glu/Glu genotype.  

Furthermore, elite sprint/power athletes were 3.41 times more likely than national-level athletes to have the Asp/Asp genotype compared to the Glu/Glu genotype.  

The authors of the study postulated that reduced lactate clearance in Asp (A) variant carriers, particularly those with two copies of the Asp variant, may, perhaps counterintuitively, be beneficial for sprint and power performance. Why may this be the case?

Recall that lactate also acts as a hormone (lactormone) or signalling molecule, and can stimulate signalling pathways (e.g. mTOR, IGF-1) that promote muscle growth and hypertrophy. The researchers speculated that higher lactate levels in the bloodstream seen in Asp (A) variant carriers (due to less effective lactate clearance) may act to stimulate muscle growth in the long-term, therefore enhancing muscle size and sprint/power performance.

While this hypothesis is worth exploring, it is also worth noting that a study of MCT1 genotypes in elite Japanese wrestlers found that while the Asp/Asp genotype was overrepresented in wrestlers compared to controls, this genotype was in fact associated with lower blood lactate levels during the 30 second Wingate-anaerobic test.